Still Writing

51QJqkpcXwL._SY300_

I’ve been waiting for Still Writing for a long time, ever since Dani first mentioned her new project to our class, sitting in her living room, surrounded by books.  Oh, those books!  Those books, alphabetized by author’s name and categorized by type, over which my eyes glided so many times during the hours I was immensely privileged to sit in Dani’s house as a member of her writing class.  I learned more than I can possibly articulate from Dani and from my classmates during the 2 1/2 years I participated.  I left Dani’s workshop this past winter during a time in my life when I felt simultaneously overwhelmed by responsibilities and demands and painfully aware of how short my childrens’ time at home was.  I miss it, but I will never forget what I learned, and I know I’ll be enriched for the rest of my writing days by my time in the class.

All of this preamble is to say: I’m wildly fortunate to be able to call Dani my teacher.  Reading Still Writing felt like listening to Dani talk, and I can tell you first-hand that that’s an immense gift.  Still Writing is full of both specific ideas for and wise observations about the writing life, and it contains the kind of language that makes my eyes fill with tears and the kind of richness that I think about for days, weeks, and months.

At the outset of Still Writing, Dani asserts that “the page is your mirror” and quotes Emerson on how the good writer “seems to be writing about himself, but has his eye always on that thread of the universe which runs through himself and all things.”  These two images together remind us that every day a writer deals with the granular reality of him or herself and also with the largest questions of human experience.  Still Writing does the exact same thing.  Dani tells stories from her own life, both to show us how she came to be the writer she is and to demonstrate certain truths about the creative life.  She also makes concrete suggestions which are pragmatic and thought-provoking in equal measure.  Still Writing is studded with quotes from other writers and thinkers; by weaving these words with her own Dani both adds resonance to her narrative and affirms her place in the highest choir of those who write about writing.

The book is structured in three parts: Beginnings, Middles, and Endings.

Beginnings are about facing down our internal censor, about finding a place to sit that is a room of one’s own, and of locating the “shimmer around the edges” that Joan Didion described.  To begin is to find what Dani describes as a toehold – whether that’s character or place or dialogue or plot – and to release our need for permission.  To write is to sit down, over and over again, to stay with something when it gets hard, not to look away.  “The practice is the art,” Dani reminds us.  There is no avoiding doing the work.  At the beginning it is also particularly useful to have a guide, and when Dani describes her first mentor, Grace Paley (to whom Still Writing is dedicated), I found myself nodding vigorously.  As I read Dani say of Paley, “I often found myself on the verge of tears when I was in her presence,” I was myself in tears.  The fact is that’s precisely how I felt about Dani when I first met her, and how I continue to feel.  There are people who touch something deep inside us, in whom we recognize something kindred and also something to which we aspire.  Dani is one of those people for me.

Middles are about courage and quiet tenacity, about muses and finding the right early readers, about identifying the subconscious tics that fill our work and the inheritance and history that colors and shapes our writing, and about that monstrously difficult thing, structure.  In this section Dani shares a line from Aristotle that I have heard her say in person more than once: “Action is not plot, but merely the result of pathos.”  She declares that “if you have people, you will have pathos” and goes on to say that for artists there is “no satisfaction whatever at any time.  There is only a queer, divine dissatisfaction, a blessed unrest that keeps us marching and makes us more alive than the others.”  The blessed unrest of which Dani speaks gives me that now-familiar sensation (because I’ve felt it many times when reading her work) of being known from the inside out, of someone reading my mind and putting into words something I’ve felt but been unable to articulate.  Yes.  The pathos that we see, she is saying, is unavoidable, and though it hurts, we must keep seeing it and sharing it.

Middles is my favorite part of Still Writing.  Dani urges us not to give up, to believe that “just at the height of hopelessness, frustration, and despair… we find the most hidden and valuable gifts of the process.”  I am in the middle myself – of writing, of thinking, of life itself and her words encourage me more than I can articulate.  “It has been said that the blessing is next to the wound,” Dani writes in Middles, and I began to cry.  There’s no question this is true of me: my wound and my wonder are two sides of the same truth, of the frank astonishment at this world that is the lens through which I see every day.  Again Dani describes something so true it sends a shiver up my spine:

I’ve learned that it isn’t so easy to witness what is actually happening.  The eggs, the cows.  But my days are made up of these moments.  If I dismiss the ordinary – waiting fort the special, the extreme, the extraordinary to happen – I may just miss my life…. It is the job of the writer to say, look at that.  To point. To shine a light. But it isn’t that which is already bright and beckoning that needs our attention. We develop our sensitivity – to use John Berger’s phrase, our “ways of seeing” – in order to bear witness to what is.  Our tender hopes and dreams, our joy, frailty, grief, fear, longing, desire – every human being is a landscape….This human catastrophe, this accumulation of ordinary blessings, of unbearable losses.

Endings are about the “prickly, overly sensitive, socially awkward group of people” that form a writer’s tribe (just that description alone makes me sigh with identification), the themes that “sharpen and raise themselves as if written in Braille,” the necessity of telling our stories, even when it is hard, the fearful uncertainty of the business side of a career in writing, and the dangerous, seductive power of envy.  It is also in Endings that Dani reflects on some of the grand themes of the writing life.  It is in this section that we see most clearly that Still Writing is about more than writing: it is about living in this world, about paying attention, about honoring where we came from while recognizing where we are, about those we love and can trust and those whose intentions are less clear.  It is about remaining open to the world, even – or maybe most especially – when it causes us pain.

Too often, our capacity for awe is buried beneath layers of perfectly reasonable excuses.  We feel we must protect ourselves – from hurt, disappointment, insult, loss, grief – like warriors girding for battle.  A Sabbath prayer that I have carried with me for more than half my life begins like this: “Days pass and the years vanish, and we walk sightless among the miracles.
We cannot afford to walk sightless among miracles.  Nor can we protect ourselves from suffering. We do work that thrusts us into the pulsing heart of this world, whether or not we’re in the mood, whether or not it’s difficult or painful or we’d prefer to avert our eyes. When I think of the wisest people I know, they share one defining trait: curiosity. They turn away from the minutiae of their lives – and focus on the world around them. They are motivated by a desire to explore the unfamiliar.  They are drawn towards what they don’t understand. They enjoy surprise. Some of these people are seventy, eighty, close to ninety years old, but they remind me of my son and his friend on the day I sprung them from camp. Courting astonishment. Seeking breathless wonder.

Still Writing is a book to read carefully and to savor over and over.  I’ve read it twice myself already, and I know it will join books like Annie Dillard’s The Writing Life in the pantheon of those volumes I trust most and revisit most often.  I’m fortunate and grateful to know Dani and feel sure that this volume, which contains so much of her wisdom, her heart, and her soul, will inspire passionate devotion in many, many readers.

So deep and sharp

Through the blur, I wondered if I was alone or if other parents felt the same way I did – that everything involving our children was painful in some way.  The emotions, whether they were joy, sorrow, love, or pride, were so deep and sharp that in the end they left you raw, exposed, and yes, in pain.

– Debra Ginsberg

Thank you to my friend Emily whose beautiful blog, Barnstorming, introduced me to these lines.

You are with me and I am with you.

IMG_5619

Last September, with two of these friends

I am off to spend this weekend with my dearest friends.  We met when we were 18, which means we have now known each other more than half of our lives.  We are all the same age.  We are walking through life together.  They are among the closest witnesses to my own life’s bumps, difficulties, and triumphs.  Though each of our paths is different – and have taken us as far away as London and Beijing – what we share is a genuine respect for each others’ choices and the ingrained knowledge that comes from having shared what were for me at least the most formative years of my life.

We have gathered in groups big and small over the years since college, to celebrate weddings and baptisms and to mourn deaths and divorces.  We have shared achievements large (graduate degrees) and small (children sleeping through the night – though you could argue this is not small) with each other.  We have marched in orange costumes down the central road of the campus where we all met, we have closed down more dance floors than I can count, we have all seen each other cry.  We have been each others’ bridesmaids, wingmen, and the godparents of each other’s children.  We have shared clothes, recipes, book suggestions, frantic check-in emails on the morning of 9/11 (that transcript still makes many of us cry), and many bottles of wine.  We have been on the receiving end of each others’ affection, ire, and a singing telegram dressed up as a baby.

This weekend is now the fourth annual (I wrote about it in 2010and 2012) reunion of this kind.

I have long maintained that who our closest friends are says a lot about who we are.  And on that dimension, I’m off the charts lucky.  I can’t speak for anyone else, but for me the further we get from college the more I value these women.  We met at the top of a fulcrum, poised at the very beginning of adulthood, on the cusp of our real lives.  Now we are inarguably adults.  We have made that transition together and are sharing adulthood’s startling joys and confounding darkness.  Each of our skies contains a unique constellation of children and spouses and homes and careers and parents and loves and heartbreaks and memories, but they are all full.  Perhaps most of all, we can each recognize – and celebrate – the glitter of each others’ stars.

It is with these women that I feel most at home and most truly seen.  That doesn’t mean I always feel confident around them: I don’t.  In fact I wonder, all the time, why women as remarkable as these would choose me as a friend.  But I feel safe, and loved, and known.  Our shared history – both deep and wide – is an integral part of the foundation on which my entire life is built.

I’ve written before about how certain moments in our lives particularly lend themselves to developing friendships.  This has been true for me and I value immensely the friends who are woven into our daily lives; the friends around me here who pick my kids up and drive them to practice, the friends who know to ask when I’ve had a doctor’s appointment, the friends whose children are growing up alongside mine, the friends to whom I’ve brought a potpie and a bottle of wine when they got home from the hospital with a new baby or after surgery.

But there’s something unique about the friends who’ve known you since way back when, before you were a mother, a wife, an MD or an MBA, a PTA president, a published author, a partner at a consulting firm, or a successful literary agent.  Friends who chose you as a friend when you were just you, in an LL Bean plaid flannel shirt, a pair of baggy Patagonia shorts, and a baseball cap.  Friends can tell you what your wrote your senior thesis on, remember that one night you drank too much bad white wine junior year, know who it is you first truly fell in love with, know what you called your grandparents (and met them), and with whom you speak in abbreviations and shorthand so complex that other people think you’re speaking another language.

These friends know who you are now, but they also know who you were.  This weekend, it is those intertwined years that I celebrate, and the women who have shared them with me.  Two and a half years ago I wrote this, and it’s still true:

I can feel you all next to me, your lives flanking mine, my first and most essential peer group.  We have traveled together into careers, graduate schools, marriages, motherhood.  Together we will face the aging of our parents and the growing up of our children.  We have more funerals ahead of us than behind, which is a thought both maudlin and unavoidably true.  We also have, I trust, myriad happy reunions, both formal and informal (thank you Allison, for Homosassa 2010!).  We have the joy of knowing each others’ children and spouses, and of watching each other flourish.  The road is not as linear as I might have imagined all those years ago, when I felt the future sturdy, beating next to me like a heartbeat.  Instead our paths loop forward and back, double into unexpected switchbacks, but of this I am certain: you are with me and I am with you.  Always, no matter what.

Wonder women, all alone: where feminism went wrong

IMG_6832

I read Deborah Spar’s article Where Feminism Went Wrong (sent to me by HWM, of course, thank you!) eagerly.  The first time I read it, I wept, though I wasn’t sure why.  Once again I was reminded that this subject, this lumpy, hard-to-define tangle of emotions, expectations, and raw desires touches a deep vein of inchoate emotion in me.  Then I read it again.

“Yet it was feminism that lit the spark of my generation’s dreams—feminism that, ironically and unintentionally, raised the bar for women so high that mere mortals are condemned to fall below it.”

This line rang so true that I sent it to HWM with exclamation marks.  Yes.  I relate to every word of this.  Am I a perfectionist?  Yes.  Are a great many of us?  Yes.  I imagine this is something we can all relate to.  And I do sometimes stumble, overwhelmed, exhausted.  More than once I’ve leaned my forehead onto the marble of my kitchen island, tears in my eyes, feeling angry and insufficient, disappointed in myself for being unable to do everything while simultaneously unclear on how it came to be that I felt I had to.  Spar writes that even as new professional opportunities opened to women, “none of society’s earlier expectations … disappeared. The result is a force field of highly unrealistic expectations.”  I live in this forcefield, and I know that it has equal power to seduce (we can do it all) and to destroy (oh my God I really can’t.)

And I’ve written before of how conscious I am of my mother’s and grandmothers’ struggles.  Of knowing how hard the generations who came before me – those who actually had to battle for rights and equal opportunity – fought, and of not wanting to squander that.  I call myself a feminist, enthusiastically and without apology.  This awareness underscores certain decisions I’ve made, and contributes to my deep desire to do what Spar would call “it all.”

Spar’s article’s main point (and I’m about to read her book, Wonder Women: Sex, Power, and the Quest for Perfection, so I don’t yet know if it’s the central theme there as well – see my favorite wonder woman at the top of this post) is that because women have realized how difficult it is to effect change on these topics in the broad theater of society they have turned the laser beam of that intention onto themselves.  Instead of focusing on the many, and all the women who stand shoulder-to-shoulder with them, women instead pour their prodigious energies into perfecting their individual selves.  This makes a great deal of sense to me.

“Yet because these women are grappling with so many expectations—because they are struggling more than they care to admit with the sea of choices that now confronts them—most of them are devoting whatever energies they have to controlling whatever is closest to them. Their kids’ homework, for example. Their firm’s diversity program. Their weight.”

Narrowing the lens to the entirely personal and controlling our own lives rather than focusing on the larger picture has enormous ramifications, of course.  One of them is the pressure many of us feel to be perfect, to be superwoman, which I’ve described as hugely, uncomfortably familiar for me.  Another is a pervasive, insidious feeling of loneliness which is ameliorated, at least for me, only in those rare conversations with a kindred spirit in which we can say: “You too? I thought I was the only one” (CS Lewis).  The much-discussed, much-maligned over-investment of many mothers in the lives of their children must also come from this retraining of our energies into the sphere that we can control.

In my view this behavior has another result, perhaps the most complex and charged one. Though Spar doesn’t say it point-blank in her article, I couldn’t help wondering if the judgement and negativity that so many women feel from each other has its roots here.  Doesn’t the kind of ferocious internal focus that Spar describes breed a brittle solipsism and a certain inability to empathetically cooperate?  In our quest to justify our own choices, which are paramount in a world where we too-tightly focus on our own selves, don’t we have to at least implicitly deride those of others? (I use the royal we here, because this is something I don’t believe, and try not to do, though I’m sure I sometimes fail)

I don’t have any answers here, but I am grateful for continued thoughtful discussion of the topic (see my friend Kathryn’s wonderfully interesting and intelligent take here).  The only thing I’m certain of is that there’s no single answer, and that at the end of the day all we can do is make the best decisions we can at any given moment with the information we have.  As Spar says, “women’s paths to success may be different and more complicated than men’s, and … it is better to recognize these complications than to wish them away.”  This is hard for many of us, and I’ll admit that I’m among them.  I often wonder how things would be different had I “leaned in” to my career upon graduation from business school, for example.  I don’t talk often about my professional life here, but I did write about these particular tensions for a website targeted at MBAs last month.  Spar’s piece reminded me of my own difficulty identifying the vanishingly narrow border between not trying hard enough and being realistic.

It does feel like something essential, something shiny, has been lost, though, if all we can say is we did the best we can.  I appreciate Kathryn’s acknowledgement that working full-time with children is difficult, and there’s nothing wrong with admitting that (and I’m not commenting on other models here; I haven’t lived them, and I’m certain each has its own difficulties).  I wish we could recapture the joyful, hopeful feminism that Spar mourns in her article: “the feminism … about expanding women’s choices, not constraining them. About making women’s lives richer and more fulfilling. About freeing their sexuality and the range of their loves.”

Spar ends her piece with a call to action and to arms, an invocation of all that we can be together (her use of “we” is powerful) if we released our stranglehold on our individual selves.  I’m not entirely clear on the path from here to there, but I wholeheartedly agree with and embrace her vision of where we should go:

“We need to struggle. We need to organize. And we need to dance with joy.”